JGA Counsel

authentic and strategic philanthropic consulting

Posts Tagged ‘nonprofit management’

Oct 2010 | The Importance of Metrics for Non Profits

by Meg Gammage – Tucker

 

Nonprofit professionals are regularly asked to justify the efficiency and effectiveness of their missions, programs, staff, and all other elements of their existence.   The reason—we live in an era of substantial competition for limited financial and human resources; under the light of growing public attention and scrutiny; and greater demands from donors for evidence of organizational impact and importance.

How can nonprofits deal with the growing demands of volunteers, audiences, clients, and donors who need more justification to invest in us and our missions and programs?  For the majority of the 1.6 million+ nonprofit institutions, the response has historically been to produce reports that generally outline the need for their “vital” services.  The organization then lists the number and amount of gifts received. 

It becomes somewhat circular as a justification process. 

Our clients and those who attend my classes often indicate that those reports are the extent of what they can generate given the substantial limitations on their time and staff resources.  Planning, modeling, evaluation, reports, impacts, outcomes—take too much time and they limit the energy available for running their organizations and developing and deepening donor relationships. 

It is not enough, however.   More justification and reports are necessary.  Why?  For the very reasons that you shy away from the concept:

  • you have limited resources,
  • your competition is growing, and
  • you  have to justify our existence, let alone any possibility of growth or greater impact or influence. 

In other words, you simply need to work smarter, be better, and share the results of your successes (and, sometimes, your challenges).

How can we do this?  Employ simple and effective models and metrics to:

  • illustrate your effectiveness;
  • gain the support and greater engagement of your volunteers and investors; and—certainly not last or least—
  • justify your existence. 

They do not need to be elaborate, but they do need to be meaningful, reflective, informative, and useful.  Start simple and seek board input.  Once you engage that audience and answer their questions, you can offer larger audiences more insights into your nonprofit’s efficiency and effectiveness.

Sep 2010 | Brown M & M’s: Tasty Little Gems of Philanthropic Wisdom

by Angela E. White

Do you have brown M & M’s in your office?

Apparently, when the rock band VanHalen toured in the 1980s, their contract contained Article126,  which read, “There will be no brown M&Ms in the backstage area, upon pain of forfeiture of the show, with full compensation.” 

Thus, when David Lee Roth got to the concert venue, he immediately checked the M & M bowl to see if it contained brown M & Ms.

This was not a power trip by Roth, but rather his check on details. If there were brown M & Ms in the bowl, then he would require that the concert operations plan be reviewed, line by line, so that he could ensure that no other details were overlooked.

This story was shared with me by Nicole Bickett, CEO of Vision Bridge (www.visionbridgeinc.com), an organization that works with companies to help them deal with the details and become more efficient.  I think it is also an excellent reminder of the importance of details in the work that we do in philanthropy. 

Think of the times that attention to the little details made all of the difference in building and strengthening relationships with those people who care about the mission of your organization.

So, I challenge you to think about the brown M & Ms and how attention to detail can strengthen your philanthropic work. And, by the way, I am eating M & Ms as I type this blog….and I ate the brown ones first!

Sep 2010 | Forging a Bond for Non Profit Leadership

by Dan Schipp

Last month I wrote about the critical relationship between an non profit organization’s chief executive officer (CEO) and chief advancement officer (CAO). 

I noted that the goal of a strong CEO/CAO relationship is to forge a partnership that enables each to be as effective as possible in their respective roles and with their unique skill sets. 

How do you do that?  Here are some practical suggestions.

Be clear about expectations.
The CEO and CAO have expectations of each other relative to their roles in advancing the mission, values and goals of the organization.  They must communicate openly and authentically with one another about those expectations and be willing to hold the other person accountable for addressing mutually agreed upon goals. They must be committed to helping the other to be successful.

Understand the other’s work style.
Every individual has his/her preferences for communicating, making decisions, managing, and handling conflicts.  For an effective relationship, it’s important for the CEO and CAO to acknowledge, understand, and respect the other’s preferences.  Is business best conducted formally or informally?  What communication is best done orally and what is best presented in writing (or email)?  Is the CEO or CAO more likely to make a decision on the spot or need time to process the information?

Agree to disagree and then commit.
To state the obvious, the CEO and CAO are not always going to agree with one another.  At times they will need to agree to disagree but commit to a plan of action regardless of underlying disagreements.

Don’t take the other for granted.
It’s easy to get caught up in the work and the drive for results.  The CEO/CAO’s relationship needs to reflect concern and compassion.  They need to offer and receive from each other honest feedback as well as encouragement and gratitude.

A strong relationship between a CEO and CAO sets the stage for non profit success.  Let me know if there are other approaches that have helped you strengthen your leadership bond.

Jul 2010 | Managing to Repay Debt with Capital Funds

by Meg Gammage – Tucker

Managing to Repay Debt with Capital Funds

“How can we move ahead and buy or build something and then have our clients repay the debt?”  We have historically, and still regularly do, advise strongly against this strategy. 

We have advised against this strategy for two very important reasons—

1.)     Donors often do not want to fund something that has already been built thus reducing both their financial and personal influence over its development.  This is also why we test the “preliminary” case for support.  And,

2.)    Given the recent recession and its fallout, funding activities through debt is considered by some to be a precarious strategy, at best.

Today, however, it is a reality and one that more and more clients are asking us to address.  It may not be the best way to do our work, but it is a reality with which we must deal and strategies must be devised.

Debt repayment through philanthropy is not easy, and it requires organizations to be extra thoughtful and strategic to make it possible.  It requires the following:

Mission and Program Impact

How has this investment made the world a better place? 

How has it helped achieve our mission? 

What programs have we developed or improved? 

Financial Justification

Clear and sound reasoning as to why the investment was necessary.

Why did you invest first and ask later?  Or, in other words, what did you save and how did the organization benefit financially by buying or building before the dollars were available?

Potential Donors

Knowledgeable and entrepreneurial donors –who are both already committed to your cause and who appreciate and understand that your organization can be entrepreneurial as well.

It is not an easy path—nor one we readily recommend.  But it is one that is part of our philanthropic world and one which requires both thoughtful consideration and action.

Let Meg know how helpful  Managing to Repay Debt with Capital Funds is for your organization and share your results by posting in the JGA comments section below.